Showing posts with label 張秀霞著. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 張秀霞著. Show all posts

Sunday, 28 October 2012

張秀霞的回應(四則)

文/張秀霞

回應 蓮花彥樺
10月26日2012

回應 蓮花彥樺
10月26日2012

彥樺,本來我沒有想要回應您,我知道公布了我【親眼看到不應該的事情, 聽到不可思議的事情】會帶給受害者們的傷害,所以我本意隨您去發泄。

我所見與聽的事情都是事實,考慮了好久才決定公布出來,希望你也說出來,難道您不願意承認您與盧勝彥的密切關系?

其實我對你不很了解,我們曾經隻是一起在寺廟做義務工作,一起跳舞供養,平時少說話,少接觸。

記得有一次,你要我幫忙你搽 護膚液(BODY LOTION),然后您說也幫我搽,當你在我的背后搽護膚液的時候,你很驚訝地說,我的背為什麼會受傷粗燥,這個傷就是那一次盧勝彥要我躺著,他大力的沖撞,讓我的背部在地上摩擦,當時我都不知道我受傷了,是您告訴我才知道的,可是我都沒有給您解釋為何會受傷。

非常的感謝您的四份文章【我和我所了解的張秀霞其人(一)·(二)·(三)·(四)】,這已確實証明我在2004年所記述的【親眼看到不應該的事情, 聽到不可思議的事情】是沒有妄語。

1)我的記載:她已婚,拋下丈夫,放棄事業,獨身居留在【西雅圖雷藏寺】長住回應確實証明:您有小孩,有丈夫,為何您會拋下家庭,在【西雅圖雷藏寺】長住?(長住就是長期居住,不回家的意思)
http://ilovegm.wordpress.com/2012/10/25

2)我的記載:曾在溫哥華的時候,愛嬅、黃彥樺 和我秀霞同住一間旅館的房間,剛好住在盧勝彥的隔壁,盧勝彥知道後,吩咐愛嬅和秀霞我半夜12點駕車回西雅圖,我們不敢違意,隻留下彥樺一人在旅館裡,為什麼要先吩咐愛嬅和我先離開團對, 兩個人半夜駕車三個多小時回西雅圖? 這是多麼的危,爲什麼?
回應確實証明:謝謝你還記得,眾弟子與盧勝彥一起隨行到溫哥華為菩提雷藏寺的地母金身開光,眾弟子包括寺廟裡的上師和法師,一向來一直都是一起出門一起回家,盧勝彥聽到我們三個女生住在他的隔壁,馬上就吩咐我和愛華駕車回西雅圖,盧勝彥開口說的話,誰敢不聽?半夜就隻有我和愛華駕車回家,您說,這是說的通嗎?

您也証實了隻剩你是一人住在那房間,盧勝彥明知我們是三個女生可以互相照應,卻隻要您一人留下獨睡一間房,是多麼的孤單,寂寞和危險。您說A師姐給您分一兩個人,結果你沒有確實一個或兩個人與您同住,他們是您很重要的証人,什麼名?什麼人?假真A師姐的托福,那你已辜負了盧勝彥的好安排!
http://ilovegm.wordpress.com/2012/10/25

3)我所記載:傳說彥樺是盧勝彥的前世妻子皇貴妃。盧勝彥又告訴她,她是黃蓮花童子,日前我看見真佛宗又多了一位黃蓮花童子上師,是不是好可笑?
回應確實証明:不論您是姓陳姓黃,我的聽聞您就是與蓮花童子的關系,是沒有錯吧!我能把您的姓名都寫錯,就証明我和您是少至來往。
http://ilovegm.wordpress.com/2012/10/26

4)我所記載:隻因小事,就被蓮寧趕出寺廟,被安排在溫哥華寺廟居住。回應確實証明:你說你的旅行簽證快要到期,慈悲的盧師尊吩咐我到溫哥華的華光雷藏寺真佛樓幫忙。這也確實對應了我的記載,您是為了某事情被安排在溫哥華寺廟居住。

新加坡公民去美國不是免簽証嗎?
http://ilovegm.wordpress.com/2012/10/28/

曾在溫哥華的時候, 愛嬅、黃彥樺 和我秀霞同住一間旅館的房間,  剛好住在盧勝彥的隔壁,  盧勝彥知道後, 吩咐愛嬅和秀霞我半夜12點駕車回西雅圖,我們不敢違意,  隻留下楌樺一人在旅館裡,為什麼要先吩咐愛嬅和我先離開團對, 兩個人半夜駕車三個多小時回西雅圖? 這是多麼的危險,爲什麼?楌樺 ,曾經在【西雅圖雷藏寺】轟動一時,傳說彥樺是盧勝彥的前世妻子皇貴妃。盧勝彥又告訴她,她是黃蓮花童子,日前我看見真佛宗又多了一位黃蓮花童子上師,是不是好可笑?她已婚,拋下丈夫,放棄事業,獨身居留在西雅圖雷藏寺長住,隻因小事,就被蓮寧趕出寺廟,被安排在溫哥華寺廟居住。

*****

回應【真佛護法園地】 - 這篇【以汝之矛,攻汝之盾──張秀霞之時間差篇】
10/27/2012

這一段有幾個關鍵的時間點。“一天”,“星期一早上七點半”,“那一天的晚上”,“明天早上”,“早上七點十五分”。大家根據原文的前三個段落可以判斷出,這幾個時間點是連貫的,而且暫且算是清晰。那麼根據這一段連貫的原文可以知道,張女陳述星期一早上的七點十五分至七點半之間,她來到了真佛密苑。然後在寫了一堆垃圾之後,她強調,永遠無法忘記的這一天是1997年3月11日。問題來了,根據“線上農民曆換算”的
結果:1997年3月11日,是個星期二!
回應:1997年3月11日,確真如墨實印在我的腦子裡,這位 Meekie 大德那麼的用心的去分析它的時間和日期,為何您不用心精細去了解我的遭遇,我不會去更改這個日期,那怕那天真是星期二·星期三,我無法忘記那晚將來臨的心情,無法抹除我內心的糾結在我第一步踏出女生宿舍走去【真佛密苑】的那一刻。。。。。

有哪一個女人甘願犧牲自己的名譽呢?
回應:名譽對每一個人都是非常的很重要,不論你處在哪一個社會與角落。我現在躲在家裡或說是在逃避,我內心特感污穢。我感恩我的丈夫和孩子們還在我的身邊,還有我家人和親戚的支持與安慰,但願我的作為,不會帶給他們不便和影響。

在美國的法律還有沒有公平呢?
回應:美國的法律對我實在很不公平!

毀謗文章中繪聲繪色的描寫,讓很多不了解蓮生活佛,不了解真佛宗的人產生懷疑,也跟著毀謗,我周圍也不乏受到影響的朋友。一篇篇又臭又長的文章,大家無暇細讀的時候,看到的盡是骯髒下流的詞句。
回應:重復的回憶,一幕又一幕的回想,您知道我是多麼的痛苦,才能完成我這份文章,我實屬寫告知大家,是毀謗嗎?

幼稚的是,連門楔,門鎖都可以當作證據,畫一幅畫傳上網
回應: 我不知道門楔和門鎖是不是証據,但是,在我遭遇的裡面“門楔門鎖”是很大的改變和非常的深刻,因為在做見不得人的事情,心情會很緊張,而且問事房是不能鎖的,隻用門楔,我會感到害怕和緊張,切不敢退怯盧勝彥的命令(就算盧勝彥說話是多麼的溫柔,誰敢說不)。之后盧勝彥用手上門鎖,所以我才會知道門有了這種安全鎖了,這個改變是深刻的,所以我就很自然的也告訴你們。

2000年3月5日,你帶著一個孩子來美國參加大法會,而且是你自己說“仍然飛來美國參加他的法會”!2000年春季法會是在3月11日傳“馬頭明王金剛法”。那麼,你後文所說,“這2000年3月的法會,我不但沒有出現在他面前,也沒有去參加他的法會,更沒有通知他”,而且最後一次到訪是在1999年。那請問你到底去沒去西雅圖啊?那天晚餐後,在圖書館的餐廳裡,盧勝彥吩咐我跪著,他在我的背后拍打加持,在那裡夠多証人吧?

請看清楚右上角的日期 NOV 25 1999
(中間)的美國蓋印 MAR 5X 2000



大法會後的第三天,3月14日你就正式提出訴訟了,顯然你不是因為看了法會錄影帶而提告。因為,法會後三天,錄影帶尚未流通。
回應:錄影帶確實是有的,是你沒辦法拿到罷了,為何您不親自去查問出版社?請不要胡亂猜想。

那麼,一個非常合理的懷疑就是,你2000年3月份來美國,是專程而且有預謀的要提出訴訟,而不是參加法會! 訴訟也就算了,幹嘛還假惺惺地說是來參加法會呢?
回應:下面是我孩子的護照,請觀右下角美國蓋印日期,証明我是帶同孩子一起來美國參加法會,我的孩子當
時還在讀書時期,我根本就沒有什麼預謀和心機,而是避免再與盧勝彥密切的肉體關系,這是錯嗎?

【我的故事】所說都是事實,完全沒有想到在這次來美國會控告盧勝彥,也極大改變了我·孩子和家人的人生,這一剎那的改變,我受不了,孩子和家人也一剎那失去了所有,Meekie 您願意與我分擔嗎?

兒子的護照-----------


*****

回應于仙
11月08日2012年

我所認識的于仙,是一位很忠誠· 老實· 可愛· 單純的女孩。我無心要傷害你,當初我寫下 “親眼看和聽到不可思議的事情” 是發現盧勝彥的種種,這份稿我隻是想自己保存著,是擔心我將來老了失憶了,也沒有考慮要在什麼時候公開,所以這份文章是不完整的。

后來有位網絡讀者寫信給我,我才知道這份文章無意中已上了網,剛好另有位讀者提供了一份 “非常可靠的消息之二”,使我起了沖動,冥冥中早已安排,我就決定將我這份的 “親眼看到的和聽到不可思議的事情” 文章整理,再貼上真人照片,這不是抹黑,也不是毀謗,主要是說出盧勝彥的不可思議,也希望你們可以站出來。

在此先對證我曾經所記載的于仙小姐。

于仙澄清:我于仙,當時雖然和張秀霞住在旅館的同一個房間,但確定沒有接過師尊任何一通電話,也確定沒有和張秀霞一起去師尊的房間,更沒有後來的喝酒……。張秀霞寫的內容,都不是真實的!

我的記載:當天的晚上,盧勝彥親自打電話到我的旅館房間,吩咐我和于仙去他的房間,我們進了他的房間裏面,房裡沒有其他人,桌上已準備了幾個酒杯,他吩咐我們陪他喝酒(那天我與于仙是兩人同住一房)。在當晚盧勝彥在廁所裡面擁抱於仙,為什麼會這樣?

回應確實証明:我于仙,當時和張秀霞住在旅館的同一個房間。

您的回應讓我為你捏一把汗,您已和盧勝彥相應了, 20年的修行。。。。。,其實你應該選擇裝著沒有看到我的文章,這樣您就可以不用擔起這個責任。我所寫的一切都是事實,我說過我是沒有任何的證據,我把妳們也牽連是很殘忍,可是這是很嚴重的關系到五百萬弟子的慧命,就在你們的手中。

如果你們是相信佛,請你們去各國各寺廟的佛菩薩,任何仁波切,還有您所知道的成就者,去求証事實。更不要隻像 “井底蛙”,隻看到盧勝彥一個人。

1.于仙的澄清:1995-1996年我在師尊家做家務那一段時間,因為師母生病,患了飛蛇症,師尊家需要一個正直又可信賴的弟子幫忙做家務。我原本有一份很好的工作,在律師樓裏當會計員,就把工作辭掉,去幫忙做家務,一心走修行的路。為什麼後來沒做了?原因隻有一個,很簡單,隻因做不好,粗心大意,沒有達到要求,所以就沒有繼續做。

我的記載:曾經在盧勝彥的家裡做女佣,最候被開除了,不知爲什麼。回應確實証明:曾經在盧勝彥的家裡做女佣(家務),最候被開除了,是因為做不好,粗心大意,沒有達到要求,所以就沒有繼續做。

2. 于仙的澄清:師尊從未單獨進到於仙的房間,那段幫佣日子,我住在西雅圖雷藏寺女生宿舍的一樓大通舖房間,和所有掛單的女眾同住,後來搬到彩虹山莊的女生宿舍,跟心美法師同一個房間,也就是現在山莊男法師住的地方。我們都睡在地上,棉被、睡袋都放在地上,我懶得每天起床時疊好棉被,我的衣服也都放在椅子上(因沒衣櫃),有點亂。有一天,一羣上師法師同門陪著師尊,來看所有住宿房間是否衛生,看了我與心美法師合住的房間這麼亂,才寫在書上的。

我的記載:盧勝彥在大眾面前說,于仙的床是從來不收拾的,他還說,于仙告訴他反正晚上還要睡,何必要收拾整理呢。(女孩子的房間,盧勝彥爲什麼會清楚?還用說,他進去看到于仙的床沒有整理啦。)

回應確實証明:於仙說住在彩虹山莊的女生宿舍,師尊來看所有住宿房間,(也進了女生宿舍)是否衛生。

3. 于仙的澄清:母親節;師尊是很隨和的人,在母親節那天,會聽到他對所有女生講母親節快樂,也就是沒去分是不是當過母親。這是很平常的話,隻是一個節日的祝福話,但剛好張秀霞站在旁邊,講者無心,聽者有意,又被聯想到男女關係上。

我的記載:母親節那天,我們大隊人和盧勝彥在【彩虹山庄】的後山爬山,盧勝彥對大家說母親節快樂,然後他的頭轉向於仙說:“沒有生孩子的,也算是母親。”(這種動作和這句話是正常嗎?)

回應確實証明:在母親節那天,會聽到他對所有女生講母親節快樂,也就是沒去分是不是當過母親。不是我多心,然後他的頭轉向于仙說:“沒有生孩子的,也算是母親。”這種動作讓人注意是不平凡的。

*****

回應惠雯

在1996年還是1997年的開始,每當我逗留在美國西雅圖雷藏寺的時候,我和所有在雷藏寺的人都會看到,只要盧勝彥的出現,必定是左一個惠雯,右一個愛華,三人一定是並排行走,不論是從【真佛密苑】走到飯廳,還是飯廳走回【真佛密苑】,走到寺廟,還是在【彩虹山庄】,還有出去郊外都是這樣,是有怪怪的感覺,可是很快的我會轉開這種思想,因為不好的思想也是屬犯戒,我是不是很愚蠢?

惠雯這樣的回應是聰明的,看起來她好像沒有看清楚我的文章,可是我希望妳們能站出來。

Sunday, 2 September 2012

張秀霞感谢大家的一封信



Translation:

I want to thank many of you for your support, your trust and your encouragement. I am lost for words. I am very touched, and very grateful.

I want to also thank you for the many articles, and the interview conducted by Mr Cheng Yew Chung, and despite his sharp questions, I felt they must be addressed to further your understanding in Sheng-yen Lu.

Thanks,

Siew Har (signed in Chinese)

1st September 2012


張秀霞感谢大家的一封信



Translation:

I want to thank many of you for your support, your trust and your encouragement. I am lost for words. I am very touched, and very grateful.

I want to also thank you for the many articles, and the interview conducted by Mr Cheng Yew Chung, and despite his sharp questions, I felt they must be addressed to further your understanding in Sheng-yen Lu.

Thanks,

Siew Har (signed in Chinese)

1st September 2012

 

[ 蓮生活佛盧勝彥的密密密網 ]

Thursday, 30 August 2012

An Interview with SHC: A Victim of Sexual Abuse whose Courageous VoiceRoars


An Interview with SHC: A Victim of Sexual Abuse whose Courageous Voice Roars
By Cheng Yew Chung  [ 蓮生活佛盧勝彥的密密密網 ]

To many new initiates of True Buddha School, the name SHC or Siew Har Chong would not ring a bell. However, to those like myself who spent the last twenty to thirty years actively involved in True Buddha School, we will recall how Madam Chong had filed a lawsuit against Sheng-yen Lu in the year 2000, accusing Lu for alleged sexual misconduct. The lawsuit caused a stir and many newspapers reported the story. To avoid being summoned in court, Sheng-yen Lu escaped by announcing his retreat. When I first read SHC's article posted on www.shcstory.com, I could sense the truth in her words, but at the back of my mind I struggled with her so called revelation, always debating whether her story was the whole truth, half-truth or pure fabrication? It was tough for me to embrace her words.

At that time I found it hard to fathom that Living Buddha Liansheng, Sheng-yen Lu, a True Buddha to me, would commit such hideous acts of sexual abuse. I naturally felt that Madam Chong was slandering Lu. Lu also hinted that Madam Chong had secretly accepted money from other Buddhist organizations with the evil intention of defaming Lu. Like most students innocent of Lu's true behavior, we were really mad at Madam Chong's allegations.

I have been giving service of propagation through my True Buddha comics and my translation of Lu's books into English through the years. Yet, a rude awakening came upon me when a meeting between myself and Lu over one dinner in September 2010 let me see, first hand, how Lu was not the person he had claimed to be. He was rude, moody, petty, and angry. Later, when I found out through a trusted friend how Lu's ex-wife, Shimu Lu Lixiang, had privately disclosed that everything about the sexual allegations was true. Only then I realized these sexual offenses were not SHC’s fabrication, and actually involved many other women. It was a big cover up. When I reread Miss Chong's account of her sexual experience with Lu, and compared it with Lu's recent discourse on Twin Body practice, I instinctively knew that Miss Chong had once been Lu's consort.

I truly admire Madam Chong's courage to file a lawsuit against Lu, and felt that Lu's escape from USA in the name of retreat was a cowardly act. Lu was certainly no buddha as he always claims to be.

I started reading Lu’s books in 1976, took refuge with Lu in the late eighties, and officially left True Buddha School in August 2011. A year later, in August of 2012, I emailed Madam Chong and asked if she would grant me an interview. I received a quick reply that she would be happy to grant me one. Here’s the interview where she shall explain and describe to us in details what happened between herself and Sheng-yen Lu in the nineties.

Cheng: Madam Chong, I hope this email finds you well. Thank you for granting me this interview. I hope you don't mind I ask some pointed questions as I want this interview to be as informative and candid as it can be.
SHC: Thank you for the interview. For the past ten years I have received many letters of encouragement as well as mockery, but I always speak my mind. It’s really up to you to believe what you want to believe. I am not asking for anything in return. I only want everyone to learn the truth about Sheng-yen Lu, and not end up as foolish as me. Maybe your questions also echo some of the questions in people's minds. Go ahead and ask anything you wish.

Cheng: Are you residing in USA now?
SHC: Yes. In New York.

Cheng: Don’t mind I ask how old are you now? You said you have children. How many are there?
SHC: I am fifty-three. I have already revealed so much through my story, revealing my age is really no issue. I have two sons and one daughter, and they have gotten married. I have six grandchildren, and soon seven. Thanks for asking.

Cheng: Aren't you afraid that someone may harass or harm you?
SHC: Of course I am afraid. I am afraid of all the strange noises outside my house. At times I suffer from insomnia.

Cheng: Did anyone attempt to hack into your computer?
SHC: I received emails warning me not to slander their Master Lu, and these people had attempted to hack into the website to take it down. They also threatened to kill me.

Cheng: How did you survive in USA since 2000?
SHC: My first job in the States was working as a helper in a restaurant in Seattle. I bumped into some Lu's followers there. I can tell they recognized me, but we said nothing. I was fearful then. Later, I changed job and worked as a housekeeper with a hotel, and realized some of my coworkers were also Lu's followers. I was naturally afraid. Later I followed my boss to work as a home and office cleaner. My husband does not speak English, and remained unemployed. Later, we enrolled in a short course in patient care [conducted in Mandarin], and worked as caretakers for Chinese patients. However, there was the constant fear of bumping into Lu's followers in Seattle, and we decided to move to New York. In New York, while working as a cashier in a convenient store, I was apprehensive of meeting Lu's followers. Eventually, I decided to stay home and worked as a nanny for other families, and have been doing so for the past eleven years. I am taking care of my grandchildren now in between some nanny jobs.

Cheng: Have you thought of retuning to Malaysia?
SHC: Never cross my mind to return. I don't want to leave USA. I am waiting for another chance to file a new lawsuit against Lu. I also dare not return to Malaysia, as Lu has the most followers there. It’s very easy to get rid of a person in Malaysia.

Cheng: When you filed your case against Sheng-yen Lu, he escaped instead. How did you go through those days?
SHC: I was enrolled into the witness security program, and stayed in a temporary, secure holding area. I was filled with fear, and suffered great mental stress. My life, everything, was turned around, and the stress was unbearable… Sheng-yen Lu escaped. The law enforcement side eventually closed my case. The US attorney suggested that I get my own lawyer, and so I did. I let my lawyers do their job, and waited. They told me not to do anything.
Frankly, I didn't know how I could have survived those days. While in the temporary holding, I found myself in a strange environment with no Chinese, living with all female occupants of African American and white ethnic groups. Some young, some elderly, and some with children. My English was poor, and I preferred keeping to myself in a corner. Sometimes, when there was a group meeting, I would get an interpreter. I was constantly in fear and worry. My mind was filled with thoughts of my loved ones, intertwined with images of Sheng-yen Lu bombarding me, constantly reminding me of the hideous truth that hid behind his smile. My devotion of mind and soul had all vanished. The feeling of betrayal was beyond description, and cannot be put into words…How could I possibly face my loved ones?

Cheng: How long did you stay in the secret holding area under the witness security program?
SHC: I stayed for several months until Lu’s escape. The law enforcement officials decided not to press charges against Lu as he was no longer in USA, and thus posed no threat to me. So they let me leave.

Cheng: Are you saying that Lu actually escaped while you were still under protection?
SHC: Yes.

Cheng: You mentioned in your article that guns were kept in the Ling Shen Ching Tze Temple. Aren’t you afraid that someone may want to silent you someday?
SHC: It is easy to acquire guns in the States, and completely legal to own one. The late Fang Qing died because of a gun-shot wound inflicted on her neck, so I was naturally very cautious.

Cheng: Some have accused you for trying to raise money through your website by playing the sympathy card. What do you think of this comment?
SHC: No such thing. Never cross my mind to do so. In New York, I once met the chairman of the Malaysia Association of America (MAA), and he once thought of planning a protest in the streets of New York against True Buddha School and Sheng-yen Lu, but later felt that this might cause more trauma to me. My intention of pressing charges against Sheng-yen Lu was so that Lu can be arrested, so that Lu’s evil side would be exposed. Subsequently, the chairman suggested that I post my story online, so that everyone can learn about him just as well. It took me one year to pen my story, ‘True Exposition of True Evil Facts of the True Buddha School’s Founder Living Buddha Sheng-Yen Lu’.
I worked as a nanny during the day, and had time only at night to write my story. Whenever I could not sleep, and received more inspiration, I would wake up and continue writing.   Every sentence bears my tears. Trying to complete a cohesive sentence was challenging for me. I hope everyone can understand what I wrote.
Subsequently, there was an increase in readership, and they gave me many suggestions, including the hope that someone can help with the legal fees, so that I can continue to press charges against Sheng-yen Lu in the future. Taking that advice, I uploaded my legal fee statement on my website three years ago, but till date no one has come forward to help. But it really doesn’t matter now. I believe many are aware of the true face of Sheng-yen Lu, and I hope they would not be as ignorant as me. How foolish I was!

Cheng: As your children grew up, how did they react to this matter?
SHC: My children are aware of the matter, but I am unsure how much they really know. They never bring it up, like it never happened. Well, I am glad they still love me.

Cheng: What about your husband? How is he coping these days?
SHC: To him it’s been a thorn. He’s still with me, but there are times he will burst out and tell me how stupid I was, and his words cut like a knife. I had to swallow my pride, and kept to myself.

Cheng:  When did your husband first learn of your Twin Body practice with Sheng-yen Lu?
SHC: After I decided to file charges against Lu, I called my husband from the States and informed him.

Cheng: Was he so mad that he wanted to teach Lu a lesson?
SHC: You are asking about his initial reaction? I could not see his facial reaction over the phone. I was afraid and shameful at that time. I wasn’t sure how I related the story to him, but his voice seemed frozen, and he chided me for not informing him earlier of such grave matter. The rest I couldn’t recall. All I knew was he was really mad, but he said nothing of teaching Lu a lesson.

Cheng: How did your husband cope with the reality of the matter? You wrote that Sheng-yen Lu told him in his face about your bad conduct.
SHC: When my husband arrived in the States, he kept to himself for a long time. It was fortunate that the secretary of my lawyer was with him throughout the ordeal, and it was she who brought my husband to meet Sheng-yen Lu at the Rainbow Villa in Seattle. I was unaware of their meeting, until my husband returned and handed me a letter Lu passed to him. He only said this to me, ‘Why?’
I could not face him. I was ashamed of myself. I didn’t know how he coped with all the things that were happening around us, but it was only later that I found out through conversation with the lawyer’s secretary and also my husband that my husband said nothing throughout his meeting with Sheng-yen Lu, while Lu handed him a letter I wrote, whose content shocked my husband. Sheng-yen Lu had the cheek to lie to my husband, telling him what sort of a bitch I was. Lu’s words stabbed my husband’s heart, yet he was too tired to say anything despite his anger.  He knew instinctively this Sheng-yen Lu was really a bad ass.

Cheng: May I ask what was the letter about?
SHC: I wrote several letters to Lu. The one mentioned was a letter of gratitude that Sheng-yen Lu requested from me when I was preparing to return to Malaysia. The content of the letter included some words of gratitude and some sentences describing our relationship, which was subsequently blacked out.
I remembered once during a consultation, Sheng-yen Lu told me I was his wife in a previous lifetime, and wanted me to be his wife in our future lives. He wanted me to pen this commitment in a letter, and instructed me to pass the letter to him during mealtime. When Sheng-yen Lu walked out of the library [canteen is inside the library building], I handed him the letter, and this was witnessed by many. That was my first letter. No wonder Lu boasted he received many love letters from women, as he had secured them through his Casanova ways, and used these letters as his defense. Lu is really despicable!

***Frankly, I really admire the fact that Madam Chong has a husband who loves her so deeply, as I can’t imagine the mental stress he had to endure. Madam Chong had written about the things told to her husband by Lu, and how the facts were twisted. I wonder if any man could have remained by her side after all these. Madam Chong is fortunate to have a husband who stood by her.***

Cheng:  Can you ever let go of the hurt that Lu inflicted upon you?
SHC: I don’t know. It’s just that I don’t cry as often now. Yet, I can’t help it when I reply you today. I do dream of Lu sometimes, but I would say nothing to him in the dreams, and he would also avoid me. I would keep a safe distance between Lu and myself even in my dreams.

Cheng:  Many people don’t buy your story. First, they don’t know about you, and they suspect your motive in doing all these. Some even bought into the idea planted by Lu insinuating that you are a devil in disguise to create chaos in his teachings.
SHC: I have already spoken and written about my true account, and all I hope is that no one end up as superstitious and foolish as me, for the price is a lifetime of regret! There is nothing I can do about what people choose to believe.

Cheng: Lu insinuated that you have accepted money from other religious groups to cause damage to him, and claimed to be the victim instead. What is your view regarding this?
SHC: He can say what he likes. I can’t do a thing about what he wants to say. He answers to his karma. I am very clear what kind of an animal he is, so what is all the talk about compassion and Buddhahood?

Cheng: Do you think Lu’s successor, second patriarch Master Lian-ning has got something on Lu?
SHC: Maybe! Everyone who wants to meet Lu for consultation, and practically all letters to Lu must be vetted and arranged by Lian-ning, including the decision to close the door to the consultation room. So Lian-ning certainly knows many things about Lu.

Cheng: What kind of a person is he?
SHC: He is addicted to power, and often reprimands the monks and nuns in the temple. Perhaps this display of authority is necessary since he is the supervisor of the temple, but I am aware that no one likes him in the temple, and most would keep a distance from him.

Cheng:  I heard Lu has a disciple called Lotus Bao Er who had cheated many of their money. Sheng-yen Lu trusted this person. What’s your view regarding this?
SHC: This proves to me that Sheng-yen Lu has no supernatural powers as he so claims. The first photo posted on this webpage(http://www.shcstory.com/photos.html)  is Bao Er, who was spotted wearing shorts. She always wore shorts when she came to the temple. I have never seen her involved in any practice sessions, yet she was given the title of a senior instructor by Lu. It caused a stir, and many found it hard to accept.

Cheng: You said that you had contracted herpes simplex virus through Sheng-yen Lu. Someone wrote online why didn’t you sue Lu using your herpes medical report. Basically, they are suspicious of your motive. What is your view regarding this comment?
SHC: It never occurs to me that you can actually file a lawsuit with a herpes report. I had uploaded the report online to let everyone know that Sheng-yen Lu has herpes as well, and if he goes for herpes test, he would carry the same virus as I have, because I got it from him. My apologies. I speak my mind, and if there is anything unclear you can always ask.

Cheng: Sheng-yen Lu recently wrote a six-part article “Escape 1-6” (http://religiousbullshit.wordpress.com/2012/07/01/6/) and they were published in his 222th book “Insight on Adversities”. What’s your comment on these articles?
SHC: These stories are disgusting and fabricated to divert attention away from the truth. Miss May Tay from Singapore told me how Master Lianyin had arranged for her to meet Sheng-yen Lu, and how Lu reacted when he first saw her. He closed the door of the consultation room, and as he told her to sit on the floor, he held her hands and spoke gently and affectionately to her…
Reverend Lianting told me the same thing happened to her, and I experienced that too! Sheng-yen Lu is nothing but a fraud who resorts to the same trick to seduce women, unlike what he claims that others are trying to seduce him. When he held my hands as we were sitting on the floor, I was at first afraid that somehow my mundane nature would taint his eminence, the holy supreme living Buddha. Yet I was equally surprised and happy that His Holiness would not forsake an ordinary woman like myself, and actually thought highly of me. How silly of me then!

Cheng: In his article “Escape-part 2”, he mentioned a woman who had attempted to sue the famous author Feng Feng (Peter Faun, 1931-2007), and likely the same woman who stayed in the Seattle’s temple and attempted to seduce Sheng-yen Lu. The article may hint at you as the woman involved. Is Lu talking about you?
SHC: I read his articles, and none appeared to fit my experience. I am unaware if he had written about me in other articles. But if he would dare to write truthfully about me, I would applaud his guts. He must answer to the negative karma of his fabrication. Good luck to him!

Cheng: In 2008, Attorney Huey-Fang Zhou(周慧芳律師) wrote an article “Speaking the Unspoken” which debunked the claims made by you. I met attorney Zhou and her husband several times, and I can tell you she is quite a sharp and capable career woman. I saw in her what I experienced then, that we were blinded by the misinformation released by the school. Had she spoken to Shimu and found out about the truth, she and her husband would disassociate themselves from the school.
SHC: Law is all Greek to me.  I only know that a crook should be arrested. The prosecutor told me I had a good case and he would arrange for a date to arrest Sheng-yen Lu. The law enforcement officials informed me they had filed for an arrest warrant against Lu, and they would act immediately once the warrant was approved and issued...
Why would the prosecutor file a warrant if he didn’t think there was truth in the case? Yet, when Lu escaped, the prosecutor said that the law enforcement officials decided not to prosecute Lu and the case would not subject to any further review by the Office of the Attorney General for the State of Washington. The reason given to me by the prosecutor’s superior was that my case would be dismissed since no forcible compulsion or violence was involved. The Washington State law does not intervene in the intimate relationship between religious leaders and their followers. The attorney’s superior added that Lu was a well-known personality, and they were mindful of the press.
I asked the prosecutor’s superior if other women were to press charges against Lu for sexual misconduct, what would they do?  The office maintained its stand, that they would not press charges against Sheng-yen Lu.
Is that what First Amendment is all about?
I posted a record of our meeting on my http://shcstory.com/result.html. Even the Senior Deputy Prosecuting Attorney had expressed no doubt on my statements.

Cheng: I read the meeting summary, and basically you don’t have a case against Sheng-yen Lu. US laws will not intervene in the intimate relationship between religious leaders and their followers. You are no doubt a victim of Lu’s sweetheart scam, and in Taiwan he can be brought to court for molest or sexual abuse on moral grounds. In the States,  I believe even rape is involved in the temple, Sheng-yen Lu can produce the love letters you wrote him, and with the support of the temple, no one will come forward as witness, and its really your words against theirs. This interview may not give you the justice you had demanded from the US court,  but your courage in speaking up, thus allowing the world to examine your story, to rethink the truth of this matter, this is important. This is the facebook and iphone era. Maybe it is your destiny that you are the voice for this matter (other victims chose silence). Many will get to know you again, and will seriously rethink this incident, especially now that Sheng-yen Lu has publicly said that he is proficient in the art of Twin Body practice. It’s been tough on you.

Cheng: Attorney Zhou wrote that the layout of the True Buddha Quarter is no secret. What is your view on this?
SHC: If Reverend Biyan, who was in charge of tidying Lu’s office insisted that the diagram I drew, and the position of the naked female statue were all my fabrication, she would have seen her years of cultivation down the drain. Will Sheng-yen Lu guarantee your rebirth in the Mara[not Maha] Twin Lotus Ponds?
If the True Buddha Quarter was opened to outsiders, and the inner layout and arrangement were familiar to most disciples, can anyone tell me if he or she knows a smaller pillow made of jade pieces was placed inside Sheng-yen Lu’s pillow? The jade pillow fell out when Lu placed his pillow for me to rest upon. Do you think Sheng-yen Lu would reveal the hidden jade pillow during the open house to his private room?

Cheng: Attorney Zhou wrote that it would be impossible for you to enter the True Buddha Quarter given the function of the place. What is your comment on this?
SHC: Sheng-yen Lu instructed me to enter the True Buddha Quarter at 7.30am, as this is the time where most people would report to the temple and commit to group practice. The only exception is when a person is too sick to get out of bed. Actually if you are sick the more reason you need to go and pray for sooner recovery. I too need to sign in for practice.
May I ask if Attorney Zhou had gone through the record of signing in? When I was staying in the temple, there were days where I was absent from signing in. Perhaps once or twice, you could say that I was sick. Did you ever investigate further to see if someone can take leave every week, or the frequency of absence per week? Master Lian-ning was extremely strict with guests who did not follow the temple’s code of conduct, as they would not be granted stay.

[Attorney Zhou’s comment 1: Impossibility of SHC’s claim with regards to outer circumstances]
SHC: One morning, between 7.30 to 7.45am, a boy was seen playing a ball outside the house opposite of the True Buddha Quarter. Maybe you can ask if anyone had seen me enter the True Buddha Quarter?
That morning I was hesitant to enter the True Buddha Quarter because of the boy. Sheng-yen Lu called the female dormitory and at that time no one was around except me. I picked up the phone and it was Lu on the other end! I told him there was someone outside and he said don’t bother. Just come by! So I just hang my head low and walked towards the True Buddha Quarter, opened the door and entered. I wondered if the boy had seen me?

[Attorney Zhou’s comment 2: Impossibility of SHC’s claims with regards to time]
SHC: Sheng-yen Lu’s stealthy presence was mostly unknown. If his presence were known, then he would not have achieved his objective. Once in the morning after Lu had lost his temper the previous day, I happened to exit the female dormitory on my way to group practice, and Lu arrived. He waved to me to enter the car garage. Many monks and nuns witnessed this, including Master Lianjie, Monk Reverend Lianjing etc. In the afternoon, Master Lian-ning questioned me, and I told him I acted out of Lu’s instruction, and Master Lian-ning said nothing after that. Master Lian-ning, Master Lian-jie and Reverend Jian-jing were lying because they knew only too well Sheng-yen Lu did arrive at the True Buddha Quarter at 7 plus in the morning.

[Attorney Zhou’s comment 3: Impossibility of SHC’s claims with regards to the procedure in the temple]
SHC: Lian-ning is a lying machine, but Master Chang-zhi do you want to tell lies too? During a consultation session in July of 1997, Sheng-yen Lu instructed Lian-ning and Chang-zhi to exit the consultation room, closed the door, leaving me and Lu alone in the room. There were many disciples from Kaohsiung, Taiwan, including the nun Reverend Lian-zhong in the vicinity, and Reverend Lian-zhong evidently knew I was alone in the room with Lu. Miss Pan Biling from Malaysia was also present. They could see with their own eyes what happened.  I have personally witnessed these individuals who were left alone with Lu behind closed door. They are Master Jinxiang from Japan, Senior Instructor Cunlian, Cui Huafeng (Reverend Lian-zhong), Chen Jianling (Master Lian-ting), Yuxian, Ai Hua, Hanifa, Dharma Assistant Lu Xiaofeng, and May from Singapore who was a friend of Master Lian-yin.
When the singer Fang Qing and Lu didn’t engage in the Twin Body Practice, Lu voiced his desire to retreat (which he didn’t). When Bao Er ran away with the money she cheated, Lu also voiced his desire to retreat (which he didn’t). Finally when I wanted to press charges against him, he escaped in no time and finally entered into his so-called retreat (his escape from prosecution).

Cheng: Attorney Zhou wrote that in the year 2000, not only did SHC press charges against Lu for sexual misconduct, she also pressed charges against the temple for negligence of supervision, and claimed for compensation. The case against the temple spanned four years, and the trial court has dismissed on summary judgment the negligent supervision claim. Is that so?
SHC: Wrong! The lawyer had advised that I retract my charges, as we could not locate Sheng-yen Lu. After five years, the court shall close the case, and I would no longer be able to press charges against Lu. Please read my lawyer’s letter which I have uploaded at http://www.shcstory.com/LawyerL.html. As long as I desire, I can still file a new lawsuit against Sheng-yen Lu. I hope Lu will not escape this round.

Cheng:  I reread your article and wondered why the law enforcement officials had delayed the warrant of arrest. Perhaps one would speculate on the relationship between Lu and the former governor of Washington. Moreover, year 2000 was election year, and thus, the election of a new governor. If your case came to light, it would remind people of the investigation over a donation made by the temple to the governor’s 1996 campaign committee. I felt that some may not want your case to affect the outcome of the election. Another possible scenario is that the law enforcement officials may not want to cross Sheng-yen Lu as they were aware of Lu’s relationship with the governor, his relationship with the local Chinese community, and his relationship with Taiwan.
Of course the possibility that your case may be dismissed is on the ground of consensus sex, as Lu can even prove that with your consent through your letter agreeing to become his consort would mean you have agreed to have sex with him on religious grounds, and Lu cannot be held on rape charges as you are a willing party. This is Lu’s craftiness.
However, it would be different in Taiwan, as Lu would likely be arrested on unethical conduct and tried in court later like the famous case of molest charges committed by Taichung’s Master Sheng-lun. Lu would have no chance of escape in Taiwan.
SHC: I agreed to engaging in Twin Body practice with Lu because I was led to believe I would die if I didn’t. I had no idea that Twin Body practice was actually sexual intercourse. I had seen the statues in yab-yum [sexual union of deities], and I was uneasy.
I thought that Lu was after all a monk, and a holy living Buddha. It never crossed my mind that he would really do it to me [sexual intercourse].
In Malaysia, the law is very strict over such matters.

Cheng: Sheng-yen Lu, in his discourse, said that Twin Body or consort practice is really ‘helping’ the consorts spiritually. He also sent a message to his consorts that it is important to “ask for nothing in return when you come”, and “leave with no strings attached”. Since you have been ‘helped’ by Lu over several years, can you tell me what spiritual attainment have you gained in the process? Many believe in such spiritual claims and I worry that more girls would throw themselves at Lu to seek his so-called ‘help’.
SHC: Ever since 1993 when I first received Lu’s blessing on my head in Malaysia, I would seek his help continuously every year, making multiple trips to Hong Kong, Indonesia, and even the USA. Between 1997 and 1999 when he performed the Twin Body blessing on me, my sickness did not improve, let alone any cultivation or spiritual attainment. However, I did feel I was made a True Buddha’s consort, and despite the illness, I would endure the pain and follow the True Buddha’s footstep as I believed even if my life would end in 1999 as Lu had predicted, I would be reborn in the pureland. What nonsense!
Eventually, with the help of Miss Pan, I was led to a relatively unknown witch doctor (shaman) in Malaysia, who cured me of my illness in just one session! I really regretted in believing Lu’s power. So regretful! So regretful!

Cheng: Sheng-yen Lu said, “A yogi can sexually handle three wives [consorts] a day, even four wives. If possible, he can have sex with five, six or up to seven wives per day. If a man does not learn the non-leakage practice, it is really his loss, and indeed, foolish not to do so.” What do you think of Lu’s recent discourses on Twin Body practice?
SHC: He apparently admitted his intimate and entangled relationship with women.

Cheng: What do you think of Lu’s wife Shimu Lu Lixiang?
SHC: I once told Shimu this, “It’s not easy being Shimu”. Shimu was quick to react and asked why I said that? I just said that Shimu had to manage every big and small matter within the school, and must tolerate so many things. In my heart, I was thinking she even had to put up with Lu’s womanizing. Honestly I really don’t know Shimu well, but I did feel some guilt in her presence.

Cheng: Are you aware that Sheng-yen Lu and Shimu have filed for divorce (in late 2011). Do you have any comments on this?
SHC: My readers have informed me on this matter. I feel that Lu should have arranged for a divorce prior to entering monkhood. This clearly shows that he has little respect of renunciation, and held no regards to keeping the pure precepts. Now that he is finally divorced, it is self evident that he has kept his marriage with Lu Lixiang even during his monkhood. Shimu knew only too well that Lu, like a leopard, will never change its spots, and when she discovered his infidelity [over and over again], she finally filed for divorce! Sheng-yen Lu is truly a wolf in sheep’s clothing!

Cheng: Are you close to Xu Yaqi[famous Taiwan TV host, married, who is alleged to be Lu’s consort] What’s your view on her situation?
SHC: We were once good friends, but I don’t really know her well. I would bump into her on many occasions when I flew to Seattle, as she would stay in the Rainbow Villa for a long period, lasting several weeks to one or two months. I feel this is a private matter, and I won’t poke my nose into her affair.

Cheng: What’s your view regarding the quarrel between Lu and Shimu over Xu Yaqi?
SHC: It’s just a female’s natural reaction. So it’s only normal that Shimu quarrel with Lu. Now that they have fallen out over Lu’s affair, it says a lot about Lu’s deviousness. This womanizing has lasted many years. I believe her patience has worn out.

Cheng: Why do you think Xu’s husband seems unconcerned, and continue to publicly show his support for Sheng-yen Lu?
SHC: If Xu’s husband stops his support for Lu, he is as good as admitting the alleged affair between Xu and Lu is true, and he would lose face within his circle.

Cheng: Regarding the late Fang Qing. Do you learn of things that we don’t already know online?
SHC: I only have the booklet written by Fang Qing regarding her experience with Lu. I am unaware of anything beyond what is written.

Cheng: You mentioned in your article a certain Madam M was beaten by several people in the Seattle’s temple because she said too much and was later hospitalized. Are you still in touch with her?
SHC: I lost contact with her ever since I filed my charges against Lu.

Cheng: Why was she beaten?
SHC: Madam M knew about Sheng-yen Lu’s affairs with women, and Lu had warned her not to spill her nonsense. I never asked Madam M what she knew about Lu’s affairs. Madam M had earlier listened to Lu’s advise and ended up losing lots of money, as well as her marriage because she believed Lu’s negative comments regarding her husband during her consultation with him. She had also spent thousands on auctions of Lu’s dragon’s vest and prayer beads, none of which had improved her life.

Cheng: To my knowledge, Shimu did engage detectives to track Sheng-yen Lu’s whereabouts, and evidently knew where Lu went. I believe Sheng-yen Lu does not have sex solely within the temple’s ground. When I first read your article, like many, I thought to myself how ridiculous it was to suggest that Lu actually engaged in sexual intercourse with women in his own backyard. After all, such affairs should be conducted in secrecy. We even joked that why didn’t you describe Lu disguised with a hat and sunglasses and secretly met his girlfriends in a motel far from the temple. That would make your fabrication more believable. So why would Lu want to do it in his temple? Weren’t he afraid of being seen?
SHC: It is actually more convenient to have sexual intercourse inside the True Buddha Quarter. Whenever he wanted to bestow his blessings on the woman, he would immediately engage her in sex in the privacy of his room.

Cheng: Do you suspect someone had installed a spy camera somewhere?
SHC: Maybe Shimu has installed one, otherwise how was she so convinced that Sheng-yen Lu and I was really having sex?

Cheng: Lu’s consultation room is small, and there is also a window in the room.  You said that Lu would spend time with women in his consultation room behind closed door. There are always people outside the door, likely a master. Your detractors would definitely doubt your claims here, as it would be impossible not to notice any sexual act performed in the consultation room. And isn’t Lu afraid that someone could hear or know what he was doing? Isn’t he afraid that the girl may scream on the ground of rape? What else did Lu do besides sitting down on the floor with you or other women and chat?
SHC: There is a window in the consultation room, and whenever I went into the room, Lu would close the door, and blocked the door with a door wedge. He would then closed the window curtain, and said to me, “They wouldn’t dare enter.” The word ‘They’ perhaps referring to masters or reverends? I dare not ask. Then we would proceed to do what he wanted to do. Of course these things are secret for obvious reasons. Yet no one dares to say a word.

Cheng: While in the consultation room, whenever Lu had sex with you, was it quick in quick out for him or an enjoyment which he slowly savored?
SHC: I never really took note if he was enjoying the sex. It would usually be a quick intercourse in the consultation room, as I could not stay too long in the room. The sex would be longer in his room upstairs. Usually during a dharma ceremony or when there was a group visit to the temple, there would be two masters helping with the consultation. At times when only one or two persons were seeking consultation, Lian-ning would request Lu’s presence, and leave the room. And Lu would arrange that I’ll be the last to receive consultation, so nobody would be present.
In 1999, when I went to Seattle, I realized the consultation room had added a lock. Why would the consultation room install a lock? I believe Lu was getting bolder, and as he sat on the floor, and instructed me to sit beside him, he again kissed me, and despite my reluctance as he was after all a holy living Buddha which should always remain untainted in my mind, he told me, “Come!”

Cheng: Let me get this straight. You mean to say that when the door was previously unlocked, Sheng-yen Lu was already bold enough to have sex in the consultation room with women?
SHC: Yes. I was one of them.

Cheng: I guess I have asked quite a lot. Some questions, frankly, are sensitive and few would dare to ask, and even fewer would want to reply publicly. These questions surround the details of Lu’s sexual acts with you, such as his sexual positions. Most find you unthinkably brave to disclose such details in your article “My Story”, and even your detractors would think you have some guts even if they continue to call you a bitch. Your article mentioned you had engaged in oral sex and doggy sexual style with Sheng-yen Lu. In his public discourse he claimed to know many sexual positions, as many as sixty-four styles. Can you enlighten us with your account?
SHC: Lu is all bullshit. He only preferred the doggy style. However, there was once he was on top of me, and that was the incident where the jade pillow fell out when he positioned his pillow for me to rest my head. He seemed to have trouble managing his organism and had a pre-matured ejaculation. Thereafter all sexual intercourses were performed doggy style.

Cheng: Average duration per sex?
SHC: I don’t know. As said, I never took notice of the time for each session. All I knew was everytime I entered the consultation room or his room upstairs in the True Buddha Quarter, he would readily have sex with me. He would brush aside my need for consultation, said nothing, and proceeded immediately to bless me with his vajra[penis].

Cheng: What about foreplay?
SHC: We had no foreplay, unless you consider praying to his bodhisattvas and fairies as foreplay.

Cheng: If he did pray to his bodhisattvas and fairies, then the sex would not be ‘immediate’. Are you saying that he would spend time praying to the bodhisattvas before you have sex with him in the upper room, whereas in the consultation room on the ground floor it would be immediate without prayer due to a lack of time?
SHC: He didn’t pray to the bodhisattvas every time. I guess he must have forgotten to do so! There were times he prayed to the bodhisattvas and fairies after he penetrated me, as he would hold me with one hand, while forming a fist with the other hand and placed his fist on his forehead.  When he came to orgasm, he would keep hitting his forehead with his fist.

Cheng: You mentioned about engaging in oral sex with Lu in your article. Is this performed in every sexual intercourse with him?
SHC: We only had oral sex once.

Cheng: Aren’t you worried that the noise created during sex would be heard? After all, walls have ears!
SHC: We maintained silence in the consultation room when we had sex, but Lu would moan when we were having sex upstairs. He said no one was around, so we should not worry at all!

Cheng: You said you and Lu made no noise when you were having sex with him in the consultation room. But the fact that he used the doggy sexual style to penetrate from behind means that the copulation would inevitably produce a rhythmic sound of slapping, which can be loud and easily audible. People can deduce what is happening even if the couple remains silent. How did you possibly control this loudness?
SHC: I don’t really know. I was scared to death. But indeed there was this sound. Lu had previously slapped me on my back as a form of blessing. Perhaps this was his explanation to others, if they dare to ask!

Cheng: Sheng-yen Lu is promoting Twin Body practice in the name of attaining Buddhahood within this lifetime. He openly admits that he is well versed in the art of consort practice, and that this practice is now laundered as an act of cultivation. Even if he admits to having sex with women like yourself, people would not think much of it except that you are cultivating Twin Body with the Master. Yet, the attainment of Twin Body hinges on the fact that one is able to control his ejaculation, and not judged on the sexual act itself. You mentioned that Lu often leaked, and you contracted herpes from him. Those who believe in Lu’s teachings would buy into the benefits of Twin Body practice. Can you elaborate on the frequency and severity of Lu’s seminal ejaculation?
SHC: When Sheng-yen Lu and I were having sex, he told me twice that I would likely get pregnant. And I realized he had many seminal ejaculations during our many sexual sessions. Once I noted he spilled his semen on the floor, yet Lu told me, “it’s yours”. Sheng-yen Lu had leaked too often!

Cheng: What exactly does he mean when he says “its yours”?
SHC: It means Lu was denying the fact that the semen was his ejaculation, but said they were my fluid instead.

Cheng: I see. Maybe there is a question in many people’s mind. The Seattle temple insisted that you are fabricating all this. But what I am interested to know is between the years from 1997 to 1999, can you let us know how many sexual sessions you had with Sheng-yen Lu? Just a figure will do.
SHC: No less than twenty times.

Cheng: Wow. I am speechless.
Can you also comment on his bad temper, or other out of character behavior that does not resemble a True Buddha? Like many, I build my faith in him through the impression given to me from his books. Yet, through your eyes, did you observe anything that you would like to share, as others who observe likewise would likely not talk about him in public.
SHC: This aspect is something beyond my direct knowledge and experience and I rather not comment on speculative ground. He is despicable and mean in my view, and I don’t want to draw him into my mind and probe his inner maliciousness.

*** The fact that Madam Chong refused to answer something which she did not experience first hand revealed to me a character who spoke directly and candidly about things she knew to be true by her own personal experience. I had personally experienced the disdain shown to me by Lu, whom I had believed to be a true Buddha. Yet, the Lu I later came to know was someone who is absolutely bad tempered and arrogant. This revelation by way of his example was more conclusive than the two hundred over books he wrote and painted about himself. In my view, he is far from being a true practitioner, let alone a Buddha.***

Cheng: Like to share something with you. I once spent all my life savings, about USD$7000, bought two air tickets and flew to Tahiti with my wife in search of Grandmaster Lu during his retreat.  We spent a good ten days tracking four islands in French Polynesia [Huahine, Raiatea, Moorea and Tahiti]. We didn’t locate him, but met a Chinese businessman who was curious about our search, and helped us check as he was well connected. He subsequently told us there was only one record of Lu’s visit to Tahiti, dated prior to Lu’s official retreat. That shocked us. We were undeterred, and decided upon return to Singapore that we continued to Hawaii to search for Lu, based on his descriptions, and tracked fruitlessly for nine days. We had foolishly wanted to offer Lu a bag of Ginseng head to make tea, as a way of giving support. Our single-pointedness of heart can move heavens. Yet today I told my wife, good thing we didn’t find Lu, as it is likely that he would want to take advantage of my wife, and since we have no idea what sort of a person he really is, we would literally be screwed!
SHC: Thank goodness! That was close! You mean he didn’t escape to Tahiti for his retreat? He lied again!

Cheng: Lu didn’t want you to locate him, so he played hide and seek. On the surface he was entering retreat, but in reality he was hiding in Taiwan. He was temporary staying in Oahu in Hawaii, and later visited Korea. I forgot to ask. How much money did you owe your lawyers? Did they come after you for payment? Are you able to pay them in full? Do you get financial help from others, like from your children?
SHC: I still owe my lawyers slightly over ten thousand US dollars. I don’t have the means to repay them. My husband is in and out of job over these ten years due to his poor English skills. My lawyers never chase me for payment. They just send me a monthly statement. I have relied upon myself to sustain my livelihood through the years. My children have their family and commitment, and I don’t want my children to bear the burden of the legal fee over this bad ass!

Cheng: It has been hard on you. I don’t have much money, and can’t be of any help. Maybe by publishing your email in this interview would help. If anyone wants to help you financially, they can contact you directly at shcstory4667@gmail.com.
SHC: It’s OK. Thank you for your help. I only wish that those who are fixated at Lu’s falsehood will leave his devil’s claws one day!

Cheng:  Lu publicly said that all consorts must be at least 18 years old, and frankly I am worried about the parents in True Buddha School who have young daughters in this age group. Lu has opened a Pandora box when he openly endorsed this licentious practice, and knowing how degraded his inner circle disciples can be, many would sexually abuse the opposite sex in the name of cultivation. I can foresee how bad this can get. Do you have any advise for these parents in True Buddha School?
SHC: This is why I want to press charges against Sheng-yen Lu, and revealed my story online, exposing myself (no pun intended!) to the world about my story. This is what I want to say to you. Wake up! One spiritual slip brings perpetual grief.
***

With this, I conclude my interview with Madam Chong. Honestly, having read SHC’s reply, I could still feel her rage even after all these years since reading her first posting. I admire her courage to speak up, and as one reader Raymond wrote on this website, (http://sixearsmonkey.wordpress.com), “I believe in Madam Chong solely on the ground that unless a woman really hates you, no woman in her right mind would gamble her chastity, her husband’s name, her children’s future, her family well being; forced to put up with the prejudice of men, and brave all possible threat to her life, only to falsely accuse Sheng-yen Lu of sexual abuse.”
I do not know Madam Chong personally, and I swear I never give her any monetary reward to collaborate with me on this interview. I speak with my conscience as I conduct this interview with Madam Chong, with the sole intention of exposing this self-proclaimed false Buddha called Sheng-yen Lu. Lu is indeed a wolf in sheep’s clothing, a lustful monk who sugar coats his Buddhist teachings to satisfy his sexual craving.

Sheng-yen Lu recently told his disciples not to believe in rumors about him, insinuating that we are fabricating lies to slander him. The fact that he said this further convinced me that my decision to leave him was a correct one. This scumbag is capable of lying through his teeth.
To those hardheaded disciples who remain skeptical and dismiss these accounts as fabrication, I wish you well, as you would certainly need all the luck you can get if the next sexual victim of Sheng-yen Lu happens to be someone you love and know.

An Interview with SHC: A Victim of Sexual Abuse whose Courageous Voice Roars

An Interview with SHC: A Victim of Sexual Abuse whose Courageous Voice Roars
By Cheng Yew Chung  [ 蓮生活佛盧勝彥的密密密網 ]

To many new initiates of True Buddha School, the name SHC or Siew Har Chong would not ring a bell. However, to those like myself who spent the last twenty to thirty years actively involved in True Buddha School, we will recall how Madam Chong had filed a lawsuit against Sheng-yen Lu in the year 2000, accusing Lu for alleged sexual misconduct. The lawsuit caused a stir and many newspapers reported the story. To avoid being summoned in court, Sheng-yen Lu escaped by announcing his retreat. When I first read SHC's article posted on www.shcstory.com, I could sense the truth in her words, but at the back of my mind I struggled with her so called revelation, always debating whether her story was the whole truth, half-truth or pure fabrication? It was tough for me to embrace her words.
At that time I found it hard to fathom that Living Buddha Liansheng, Sheng-yen Lu, a True Buddha to me, would commit such hideous acts of sexual abuse. I naturally felt that Madam Chong was slandering Lu. Lu also hinted that Madam Chong had secretly accepted money from other Buddhist organizations with the evil intention of defaming Lu. Like most students innocent of Lu's true behavior, we were really mad at Madam Chong's allegations.
I have been giving service of propagation through my True Buddha comics and my translation of Lu's books into English through the years. Yet, a rude awakening came upon me when a meeting between myself and Lu over one dinner in September 2010 let me see, first hand, how Lu was not the person he had claimed to be. He was rude, moody, petty, and angry. Later, when I found out through a trusted friend how Lu's ex-wife, Shimu Lu Lixiang, had privately disclosed that everything about the sexual allegations was true. Only then I realized these sexual offenses were not SHC’s fabrication, and actually involved many other women. It was a big cover up. When I reread Miss Chong's account of her sexual experience with Lu, and compared it with Lu's recent discourse on Twin Body practice, I instinctively knew that Miss Chong had once been Lu's consort.
I truly admire Madam Chong's courage to file a lawsuit against Lu, and felt that Lu's escape from USA in the name of retreat was a cowardly act. Lu was certainly no buddha as he always claims to be.
I started reading Lu’s books in 1976, took refuge with Lu in the late eighties, and officially left True Buddha School in August 2011. A year later, in August of 2012, I emailed Madam Chong and asked if she would grant me an interview. I received a quick reply that she would be happy to grant me one. Here’s the interview where she shall explain and describe to us in details what happened between herself and Sheng-yen Lu in the nineties.

Cheng: Madam Chong, I hope this email finds you well. Thank you for granting me this interview. I hope you don't mind I ask some pointed questions as I want this interview to be as informative and candid as it can be.
SHC: Thank you for the interview. For the past ten years I have received many letters of encouragement as well as mockery, but I always speak my mind. It’s really up to you to believe what you want to believe. I am not asking for anything in return. I only want everyone to learn the truth about Sheng-yen Lu, and not end up as foolish as me. Maybe your questions also echo some of the questions in people's minds. Go ahead and ask anything you wish.

Cheng: Are you residing in USA now?
SHC: Yes. In New York.

Cheng: Don’t mind I ask how old are you now? You said you have children. How many are there?
SHC: I am fifty-three. I have already revealed so much through my story, revealing my age is really no issue. I have two sons and one daughter, and they have gotten married. I have six grandchildren, and soon seven. Thanks for asking.

Cheng: Aren't you afraid that someone may harass or harm you?
SHC: Of course I am afraid. I am afraid of all the strange noises outside my house. At times I suffer from insomnia.

Cheng: Did anyone attempt to hack into your computer?
SHC: I received emails warning me not to slander their Master Lu, and these people had attempted to hack into the website to take it down. They also threatened to kill me.

Cheng: How did you survive in USA since 2000?
SHC: My first job in the States was working as a helper in a restaurant in Seattle. I bumped into some Lu's followers there. I can tell they recognized me, but we said nothing. I was fearful then. Later, I changed job and worked as a housekeeper with a hotel, and realized some of my coworkers were also Lu's followers. I was naturally afraid. Later I followed my boss to work as a home and office cleaner. My husband does not speak English, and remained unemployed. Later, we enrolled in a short course in patient care [conducted in Mandarin], and worked as caretakers for Chinese patients. However, there was the constant fear of bumping into Lu's followers in Seattle, and we decided to move to New York. In New York, while working as a cashier in a convenient store, I was apprehensive of meeting Lu's followers. Eventually, I decided to stay home and worked as a nanny for other families, and have been doing so for the past eleven years. I am taking care of my grandchildren now in between some nanny jobs.

Cheng: Have you thought of retuning to Malaysia?
SHC: Never cross my mind to return. I don't want to leave USA. I am waiting for another chance to file a new lawsuit against Lu. I also dare not return to Malaysia, as Lu has the most followers there. It’s very easy to get rid of a person in Malaysia.

Cheng: When you filed your case against Sheng-yen Lu, he escaped instead. How did you go through those days?
SHC: I was enrolled into the witness security program, and stayed in a temporary, secure holding area. I was filled with fear, and suffered great mental stress. My life, everything, was turned around, and the stress was unbearable… Sheng-yen Lu escaped. The law enforcement side eventually closed my case. The US attorney suggested that I get my own lawyer, and so I did. I let my lawyers do their job, and waited. They told me not to do anything.
Frankly, I didn't know how I could have survived those days. While in the temporary holding, I found myself in a strange environment with no Chinese, living with all female occupants of African American and white ethnic groups. Some young, some elderly, and some with children. My English was poor, and I preferred keeping to myself in a corner. Sometimes, when there was a group meeting, I would get an interpreter. I was constantly in fear and worry. My mind was filled with thoughts of my loved ones, intertwined with images of Sheng-yen Lu bombarding me, constantly reminding me of the hideous truth that hid behind his smile. My devotion of mind and soul had all vanished. The feeling of betrayal was beyond description, and cannot be put into words…How could I possibly face my loved ones?

Cheng: How long did you stay in the secret holding area under the witness security program?
SHC: I stayed for several months until Lu’s escape. The law enforcement officials decided not to press charges against Lu as he was no longer in USA, and thus posed no threat to me. So they let me leave.

Cheng: Are you saying that Lu actually escaped while you were still under protection?
SHC: Yes.

Cheng: You mentioned in your article that guns were kept in the Ling Shen Ching Tze Temple. Aren’t you afraid that someone may want to silent you someday?
SHC: It is easy to acquire guns in the States, and completely legal to own one. The late Fang Qing died because of a gun-shot wound inflicted on her neck, so I was naturally very cautious.

Cheng: Some have accused you for trying to raise money through your website by playing the sympathy card. What do you think of this comment?
SHC: No such thing. Never cross my mind to do so. In New York, I once met the chairman of the Malaysia Association of America (MAA), and he once thought of planning a protest in the streets of New York against True Buddha School and Sheng-yen Lu, but later felt that this might cause more trauma to me. My intention of pressing charges against Sheng-yen Lu was so that Lu can be arrested, so that Lu’s evil side would be exposed. Subsequently, the chairman suggested that I post my story online, so that everyone can learn about him just as well. It took me one year to pen my story, ‘True Exposition of True Evil Facts of the True Buddha School’s Founder Living Buddha Sheng-Yen Lu’.
I worked as a nanny during the day, and had time only at night to write my story. Whenever I could not sleep, and received more inspiration, I would wake up and continue writing.   Every sentence bears my tears. Trying to complete a cohesive sentence was challenging for me. I hope everyone can understand what I wrote.
Subsequently, there was an increase in readership, and they gave me many suggestions, including the hope that someone can help with the legal fees, so that I can continue to press charges against Sheng-yen Lu in the future. Taking that advice, I uploaded my legal fee statement on my website three years ago, but till date no one has come forward to help. But it really doesn’t matter now. I believe many are aware of the true face of Sheng-yen Lu, and I hope they would not be as ignorant as me. How foolish I was!

Cheng: As your children grew up, how did they react to this matter?
SHC: My children are aware of the matter, but I am unsure how much they really know. They never bring it up, like it never happened. Well, I am glad they still love me.

Cheng: What about your husband? How is he coping these days?
SHC: To him it’s been a thorn. He’s still with me, but there are times he will burst out and tell me how stupid I was, and his words cut like a knife. I had to swallow my pride, and kept to myself.

Cheng:  When did your husband first learn of your Twin Body practice with Sheng-yen Lu?
SHC: After I decided to file charges against Lu, I called my husband from the States and informed him.

Cheng: Was he so mad that he wanted to teach Lu a lesson?
SHC: You are asking about his initial reaction? I could not see his facial reaction over the phone. I was afraid and shameful at that time. I wasn’t sure how I related the story to him, but his voice seemed frozen, and he chided me for not informing him earlier of such grave matter. The rest I couldn’t recall. All I knew was he was really mad, but he said nothing of teaching Lu a lesson.

Cheng: How did your husband cope with the reality of the matter? You wrote that Sheng-yen Lu told him in his face about your bad conduct.
SHC: When my husband arrived in the States, he kept to himself for a long time. It was fortunate that the secretary of my lawyer was with him throughout the ordeal, and it was she who brought my husband to meet Sheng-yen Lu at the Rainbow Villa in Seattle. I was unaware of their meeting, until my husband returned and handed me a letter Lu passed to him. He only said this to me, ‘Why?’
I could not face him. I was ashamed of myself. I didn’t know how he coped with all the things that were happening around us, but it was only later that I found out through conversation with the lawyer’s secretary and also my husband that my husband said nothing throughout his meeting with Sheng-yen Lu, while Lu handed him a letter I wrote, whose content shocked my husband. Sheng-yen Lu had the cheek to lie to my husband, telling him what sort of a bitch I was. Lu’s words stabbed my husband’s heart, yet he was too tired to say anything despite his anger.  He knew instinctively this Sheng-yen Lu was really a bad ass.

Cheng: May I ask what was the letter about?
SHC: I wrote several letters to Lu. The one mentioned was a letter of gratitude that Sheng-yen Lu requested from me when I was preparing to return to Malaysia. The content of the letter included some words of gratitude and some sentences describing our relationship, which was subsequently blacked out.
I remembered once during a consultation, Sheng-yen Lu told me I was his wife in a previous lifetime, and wanted me to be his wife in our future lives. He wanted me to pen this commitment in a letter, and instructed me to pass the letter to him during mealtime. When Sheng-yen Lu walked out of the library [canteen is inside the library building], I handed him the letter, and this was witnessed by many. That was my first letter. No wonder Lu boasted he received many love letters from women, as he had secured them through his Casanova ways, and used these letters as his defense. Lu is really despicable!

***Frankly, I really admire the fact that Madam Chong has a husband who loves her so deeply, as I can’t imagine the mental stress he had to endure. Madam Chong had written about the things told to her husband by Lu, and how the facts were twisted. I wonder if any man could have remained by her side after all these. Madam Chong is fortunate to have a husband who stood by her.***

Cheng:  Can you ever let go of the hurt that Lu inflicted upon you?
SHC: I don’t know. It’s just that I don’t cry as often now. Yet, I can’t help it when I reply you today. I do dream of Lu sometimes, but I would say nothing to him in the dreams, and he would also avoid me. I would keep a safe distance between Lu and myself even in my dreams.

Cheng:  Many people don’t buy your story. First, they don’t know about you, and they suspect your motive in doing all these. Some even bought into the idea planted by Lu insinuating that you are a devil in disguise to create chaos in his teachings.
SHC: I have already spoken and written about my true account, and all I hope is that no one end up as superstitious and foolish as me, for the price is a lifetime of regret! There is nothing I can do about what people choose to believe.

Cheng: Lu insinuated that you have accepted money from other religious groups to cause damage to him, and claimed to be the victim instead. What is your view regarding this?
SHC: He can say what he likes. I can’t do a thing about what he wants to say. He answers to his karma. I am very clear what kind of an animal he is, so what is all the talk about compassion and Buddhahood?

Cheng: Do you think Lu’s successor, second patriarch Master Lian-ning has got something on Lu?
SHC: Maybe! Everyone who wants to meet Lu for consultation, and practically all letters to Lu must be vetted and arranged by Lian-ning, including the decision to close the door to the consultation room. So Lian-ning certainly knows many things about Lu.

Cheng: What kind of a person is he?
SHC: He is addicted to power, and often reprimands the monks and nuns in the temple. Perhaps this display of authority is necessary since he is the supervisor of the temple, but I am aware that no one likes him in the temple, and most would keep a distance from him.

Cheng:  I heard Lu has a disciple called Lotus Bao Er who had cheated many of their money. Sheng-yen Lu trusted this person. What’s your view regarding this?
SHC: This proves to me that Sheng-yen Lu has no supernatural powers as he so claims. The first photo posted on this webpage(http://www.shcstory.com/photos.html)  is Bao Er, who was spotted wearing shorts. She always wore shorts when she came to the temple. I have never seen her involved in any practice sessions, yet she was given the title of a senior instructor by Lu. It caused a stir, and many found it hard to accept.

Cheng: You said that you had contracted herpes simplex virus through Sheng-yen Lu. Someone wrote online why didn’t you sue Lu using your herpes medical report. Basically, they are suspicious of your motive. What is your view regarding this comment?
SHC: It never occurs to me that you can actually file a lawsuit with a herpes report. I had uploaded the report online to let everyone know that Sheng-yen Lu has herpes as well, and if he goes for herpes test, he would carry the same virus as I have, because I got it from him. My apologies. I speak my mind, and if there is anything unclear you can always ask.

Cheng: Sheng-yen Lu recently wrote a six-part article “Escape 1-6” (http://religiousbullshit.wordpress.com/2012/07/01/6/) and they were published in his 222th book “Insight on Adversities”. What’s your comment on these articles?
SHC: These stories are disgusting and fabricated to divert attention away from the truth. Miss May Tay from Singapore told me how Master Lianyin had arranged for her to meet Sheng-yen Lu, and how Lu reacted when he first saw her. He closed the door of the consultation room, and as he told her to sit on the floor, he held her hands and spoke gently and affectionately to her…
Reverend Lianting told me the same thing happened to her, and I experienced that too! Sheng-yen Lu is nothing but a fraud who resorts to the same trick to seduce women, unlike what he claims that others are trying to seduce him. When he held my hands as we were sitting on the floor, I was at first afraid that somehow my mundane nature would taint his eminence, the holy supreme living Buddha. Yet I was equally surprised and happy that His Holiness would not forsake an ordinary woman like myself, and actually thought highly of me. How silly of me then!

Cheng: In his article “Escape-part 2”, he mentioned a woman who had attempted to sue the famous author Feng Feng (Peter Faun, 1931-2007), and likely the same woman who stayed in the Seattle’s temple and attempted to seduce Sheng-yen Lu. The article may hint at you as the woman involved. Is Lu talking about you?
SHC: I read his articles, and none appeared to fit my experience. I am unaware if he had written about me in other articles. But if he would dare to write truthfully about me, I would applaud his guts. He must answer to the negative karma of his fabrication. Good luck to him!

Cheng: In 2008, Attorney Huey-Fang Zhou(周慧芳律師) wrote an article “Speaking the Unspoken” which debunked the claims made by you. I met attorney Zhou and her husband several times, and I can tell you she is quite a sharp and capable career woman. I saw in her what I experienced then, that we were blinded by the misinformation released by the school. Had she spoken to Shimu and found out about the truth, she and her husband would disassociate themselves from the school.
SHC: Law is all Greek to me.  I only know that a crook should be arrested. The prosecutor told me I had a good case and he would arrange for a date to arrest Sheng-yen Lu. The law enforcement officials informed me they had filed for an arrest warrant against Lu, and they would act immediately once the warrant was approved and issued...
Why would the prosecutor file a warrant if he didn’t think there was truth in the case? Yet, when Lu escaped, the prosecutor said that the law enforcement officials decided not to prosecute Lu and the case would not subject to any further review by the Office of the Attorney General for the State of Washington. The reason given to me by the prosecutor’s superior was that my case would be dismissed since no forcible compulsion or violence was involved. The Washington State law does not intervene in the intimate relationship between religious leaders and their followers. The attorney’s superior added that Lu was a well-known personality, and they were mindful of the press.
I asked the prosecutor’s superior if other women were to press charges against Lu for sexual misconduct, what would they do?  The office maintained its stand, that they would not press charges against Sheng-yen Lu.
Is that what First Amendment is all about?
I posted a record of our meeting on my http://shcstory.com/result.html. Even the Senior Deputy Prosecuting Attorney had expressed no doubt on my statements.

Cheng: I read the meeting summary, and basically you don’t have a case against Sheng-yen Lu. US laws will not intervene in the intimate relationship between religious leaders and their followers. You are no doubt a victim of Lu’s sweetheart scam, and in Taiwan he can be brought to court for molest or sexual abuse on moral grounds. In the States,  I believe even rape is involved in the temple, Sheng-yen Lu can produce the love letters you wrote him, and with the support of the temple, no one will come forward as witness, and its really your words against theirs. This interview may not give you the justice you had demanded from the US court,  but your courage in speaking up, thus allowing the world to examine your story, to rethink the truth of this matter, this is important. This is the facebook and iphone era. Maybe it is your destiny that you are the voice for this matter (other victims chose silence). Many will get to know you again, and will seriously rethink this incident, especially now that Sheng-yen Lu has publicly said that he is proficient in the art of Twin Body practice. It’s been tough on you.

Cheng: Attorney Zhou wrote that the layout of the True Buddha Quarter is no secret. What is your view on this?
SHC: If Reverend Biyan, who was in charge of tidying Lu’s office insisted that the diagram I drew, and the position of the naked female statue were all my fabrication, she would have seen her years of cultivation down the drain. Will Sheng-yen Lu guarantee your rebirth in the Mara[not Maha] Twin Lotus Ponds?
If the True Buddha Quarter was opened to outsiders, and the inner layout and arrangement were familiar to most disciples, can anyone tell me if he or she knows a smaller pillow made of jade pieces was placed inside Sheng-yen Lu’s pillow? The jade pillow fell out when Lu placed his pillow for me to rest upon. Do you think Sheng-yen Lu would reveal the hidden jade pillow during the open house to his private room?

Cheng: Attorney Zhou wrote that it would be impossible for you to enter the True Buddha Quarter given the function of the place. What is your comment on this?
SHC: Sheng-yen Lu instructed me to enter the True Buddha Quarter at 7.30am, as this is the time where most people would report to the temple and commit to group practice. The only exception is when a person is too sick to get out of bed. Actually if you are sick the more reason you need to go and pray for sooner recovery. I too need to sign in for practice.
May I ask if Attorney Zhou had gone through the record of signing in? When I was staying in the temple, there were days where I was absent from signing in. Perhaps once or twice, you could say that I was sick. Did you ever investigate further to see if someone can take leave every week, or the frequency of absence per week? Master Lian-ning was extremely strict with guests who did not follow the temple’s code of conduct, as they would not be granted stay.

[Attorney Zhou’s comment 1: Impossibility of SHC’s claim with regards to outer circumstances]
SHC: One morning, between 7.30 to 7.45am, a boy was seen playing a ball outside the house opposite of the True Buddha Quarter. Maybe you can ask if anyone had seen me enter the True Buddha Quarter?
That morning I was hesitant to enter the True Buddha Quarter because of the boy. Sheng-yen Lu called the female dormitory and at that time no one was around except me. I picked up the phone and it was Lu on the other end! I told him there was someone outside and he said don’t bother. Just come by! So I just hang my head low and walked towards the True Buddha Quarter, opened the door and entered. I wondered if the boy had seen me?

[Attorney Zhou’s comment 2: Impossibility of SHC’s claims with regards to time]
SHC: Sheng-yen Lu’s stealthy presence was mostly unknown. If his presence were known, then he would not have achieved his objective. Once in the morning after Lu had lost his temper the previous day, I happened to exit the female dormitory on my way to group practice, and Lu arrived. He waved to me to enter the car garage. Many monks and nuns witnessed this, including Master Lianjie, Monk Reverend Lianjing etc. In the afternoon, Master Lian-ning questioned me, and I told him I acted out of Lu’s instruction, and Master Lian-ning said nothing after that. Master Lian-ning, Master Lian-jie and Reverend Jian-jing were lying because they knew only too well Sheng-yen Lu did arrive at the True Buddha Quarter at 7 plus in the morning.

[Attorney Zhou’s comment 3: Impossibility of SHC’s claims with regards to the procedure in the temple]
SHC: Lian-ning is a lying machine, but Master Chang-zhi do you want to tell lies too? During a consultation session in July of 1997, Sheng-yen Lu instructed Lian-ning and Chang-zhi to exit the consultation room, closed the door, leaving me and Lu alone in the room. There were many disciples from Kaohsiung, Taiwan, including the nun Reverend Lian-zhong in the vicinity, and Reverend Lian-zhong evidently knew I was alone in the room with Lu. Miss Pan Biling from Malaysia was also present. They could see with their own eyes what happened.  I have personally witnessed these individuals who were left alone with Lu behind closed door. They are Master Jinxiang from Japan, Senior Instructor Cunlian, Cui Huafeng (Reverend Lian-zhong), Chen Jianling (Master Lian-ting), Yuxian, Ai Hua, Hanifa, Dharma Assistant Lu Xiaofeng, and May from Singapore who was a friend of Master Lian-yin.
When the singer Fang Qing and Lu didn’t engage in the Twin Body Practice, Lu voiced his desire to retreat (which he didn’t). When Bao Er ran away with the money she cheated, Lu also voiced his desire to retreat (which he didn’t). Finally when I wanted to press charges against him, he escaped in no time and finally entered into his so-called retreat (his escape from prosecution).

Cheng: Attorney Zhou wrote that in the year 2000, not only did SHC press charges against Lu for sexual misconduct, she also pressed charges against the temple for negligence of supervision, and claimed for compensation. The case against the temple spanned four years, and the trial court has dismissed on summary judgment the negligent supervision claim. Is that so?
SHC: Wrong! The lawyer had advised that I retract my charges, as we could not locate Sheng-yen Lu. After five years, the court shall close the case, and I would no longer be able to press charges against Lu. Please read my lawyer’s letter which I have uploaded at http://www.shcstory.com/LawyerL.html. As long as I desire, I can still file a new lawsuit against Sheng-yen Lu. I hope Lu will not escape this round.

Cheng:  I reread your article and wondered why the law enforcement officials had delayed the warrant of arrest. Perhaps one would speculate on the relationship between Lu and the former governor of Washington. Moreover, year 2000 was election year, and thus, the election of a new governor. If your case came to light, it would remind people of the investigation over a donation made by the temple to the governor’s 1996 campaign committee. I felt that some may not want your case to affect the outcome of the election. Another possible scenario is that the law enforcement officials may not want to cross Sheng-yen Lu as they were aware of Lu’s relationship with the governor, his relationship with the local Chinese community, and his relationship with Taiwan.
Of course the possibility that your case may be dismissed is on the ground of consensus sex, as Lu can even prove that with your consent through your letter agreeing to become his consort would mean you have agreed to have sex with him on religious grounds, and Lu cannot be held on rape charges as you are a willing party. This is Lu’s craftiness.
However, it would be different in Taiwan, as Lu would likely be arrested on unethical conduct and tried in court later like the famous case of molest charges committed by Taichung’s Master Sheng-lun. Lu would have no chance of escape in Taiwan.
SHC: I agreed to engaging in Twin Body practice with Lu because I was led to believe I would die if I didn’t. I had no idea that Twin Body practice was actually sexual intercourse. I had seen the statues in yab-yum [sexual union of deities], and I was uneasy.
I thought that Lu was after all a monk, and a holy living Buddha. It never crossed my mind that he would really do it to me [sexual intercourse].
In Malaysia, the law is very strict over such matters.

Cheng: Sheng-yen Lu, in his discourse, said that Twin Body or consort practice is really ‘helping’ the consorts spiritually. He also sent a message to his consorts that it is important to “ask for nothing in return when you come”, and “leave with no strings attached”. Since you have been ‘helped’ by Lu over several years, can you tell me what spiritual attainment have you gained in the process? Many believe in such spiritual claims and I worry that more girls would throw themselves at Lu to seek his so-called ‘help’.
SHC: Ever since 1993 when I first received Lu’s blessing on my head in Malaysia, I would seek his help continuously every year, making multiple trips to Hong Kong, Indonesia, and even the USA. Between 1997 and 1999 when he performed the Twin Body blessing on me, my sickness did not improve, let alone any cultivation or spiritual attainment. However, I did feel I was made a True Buddha’s consort, and despite the illness, I would endure the pain and follow the True Buddha’s footstep as I believed even if my life would end in 1999 as Lu had predicted, I would be reborn in the pureland. What nonsense!
Eventually, with the help of Miss Pan, I was led to a relatively unknown witch doctor (shaman) in Malaysia, who cured me of my illness in just one session! I really regretted in believing Lu’s power. So regretful! So regretful!

Cheng: Sheng-yen Lu said, “A yogi can sexually handle three wives [consorts] a day, even four wives. If possible, he can have sex with five, six or up to seven wives per day. If a man does not learn the non-leakage practice, it is really his loss, and indeed, foolish not to do so.” What do you think of Lu’s recent discourses on Twin Body practice?
SHC: He apparently admitted his intimate and entangled relationship with women.

Cheng: What do you think of Lu’s wife Shimu Lu Lixiang?
SHC: I once told Shimu this, “It’s not easy being Shimu”. Shimu was quick to react and asked why I said that? I just said that Shimu had to manage every big and small matter within the school, and must tolerate so many things. In my heart, I was thinking she even had to put up with Lu’s womanizing. Honestly I really don’t know Shimu well, but I did feel some guilt in her presence.

Cheng: Are you aware that Sheng-yen Lu and Shimu have filed for divorce (in late 2011). Do you have any comments on this?
SHC: My readers have informed me on this matter. I feel that Lu should have arranged for a divorce prior to entering monkhood. This clearly shows that he has little respect of renunciation, and held no regards to keeping the pure precepts. Now that he is finally divorced, it is self evident that he has kept his marriage with Lu Lixiang even during his monkhood. Shimu knew only too well that Lu, like a leopard, will never change its spots, and when she discovered his infidelity [over and over again], she finally filed for divorce! Sheng-yen Lu is truly a wolf in sheep’s clothing!

Cheng: Are you close to Xu Yaqi[famous Taiwan TV host, married, who is alleged to be Lu’s consort] What’s your view on her situation?
SHC: We were once good friends, but I don’t really know her well. I would bump into her on many occasions when I flew to Seattle, as she would stay in the Rainbow Villa for a long period, lasting several weeks to one or two months. I feel this is a private matter, and I won’t poke my nose into her affair.

Cheng: What’s your view regarding the quarrel between Lu and Shimu over Xu Yaqi?
SHC: It’s just a female’s natural reaction. So it’s only normal that Shimu quarrel with Lu. Now that they have fallen out over Lu’s affair, it says a lot about Lu’s deviousness. This womanizing has lasted many years. I believe her patience has worn out.

Cheng: Why do you think Xu’s husband seems unconcerned, and continue to publicly show his support for Sheng-yen Lu?
SHC: If Xu’s husband stops his support for Lu, he is as good as admitting the alleged affair between Xu and Lu is true, and he would lose face within his circle.

Cheng: Regarding the late Fang Qing. Do you learn of things that we don’t already know online?
SHC: I only have the booklet written by Fang Qing regarding her experience with Lu. I am unaware of anything beyond what is written.

Cheng: You mentioned in your article a certain Madam M was beaten by several people in the Seattle’s temple because she said too much and was later hospitalized. Are you still in touch with her?
SHC: I lost contact with her ever since I filed my charges against Lu.

Cheng: Why was she beaten?
SHC: Madam M knew about Sheng-yen Lu’s affairs with women, and Lu had warned her not to spill her nonsense. I never asked Madam M what she knew about Lu’s affairs. Madam M had earlier listened to Lu’s advise and ended up losing lots of money, as well as her marriage because she believed Lu’s negative comments regarding her husband during her consultation with him. She had also spent thousands on auctions of Lu’s dragon’s vest and prayer beads, none of which had improved her life.

Cheng: To my knowledge, Shimu did engage detectives to track Sheng-yen Lu’s whereabouts, and evidently knew where Lu went. I believe Sheng-yen Lu does not have sex solely within the temple’s ground. When I first read your article, like many, I thought to myself how ridiculous it was to suggest that Lu actually engaged in sexual intercourse with women in his own backyard. After all, such affairs should be conducted in secrecy. We even joked that why didn’t you describe Lu disguised with a hat and sunglasses and secretly met his girlfriends in a motel far from the temple. That would make your fabrication more believable. So why would Lu want to do it in his temple? Weren’t he afraid of being seen?
SHC: It is actually more convenient to have sexual intercourse inside the True Buddha Quarter. Whenever he wanted to bestow his blessings on the woman, he would immediately engage her in sex in the privacy of his room.

Cheng: Do you suspect someone had installed a spy camera somewhere?
SHC: Maybe Shimu has installed one, otherwise how was she so convinced that Sheng-yen Lu and I was really having sex?

Cheng: Lu’s consultation room is small, and there is also a window in the room.  You said that Lu would spend time with women in his consultation room behind closed door. There are always people outside the door, likely a master. Your detractors would definitely doubt your claims here, as it would be impossible not to notice any sexual act performed in the consultation room. And isn’t Lu afraid that someone could hear or know what he was doing? Isn’t he afraid that the girl may scream on the ground of rape? What else did Lu do besides sitting down on the floor with you or other women and chat?
SHC: There is a window in the consultation room, and whenever I went into the room, Lu would close the door, and blocked the door with a door wedge. He would then closed the window curtain, and said to me, “They wouldn’t dare enter.” The word ‘They’ perhaps referring to masters or reverends? I dare not ask. Then we would proceed to do what he wanted to do. Of course these things are secret for obvious reasons. Yet no one dares to say a word.

Cheng: While in the consultation room, whenever Lu had sex with you, was it quick in quick out for him or an enjoyment which he slowly savored?
SHC: I never really took note if he was enjoying the sex. It would usually be a quick intercourse in the consultation room, as I could not stay too long in the room. The sex would be longer in his room upstairs. Usually during a dharma ceremony or when there was a group visit to the temple, there would be two masters helping with the consultation. At times when only one or two persons were seeking consultation, Lian-ning would request Lu’s presence, and leave the room. And Lu would arrange that I’ll be the last to receive consultation, so nobody would be present.
In 1999, when I went to Seattle, I realized the consultation room had added a lock. Why would the consultation room install a lock? I believe Lu was getting bolder, and as he sat on the floor, and instructed me to sit beside him, he again kissed me, and despite my reluctance as he was after all a holy living Buddha which should always remain untainted in my mind, he told me, “Come!”

Cheng: Let me get this straight. You mean to say that when the door was previously unlocked, Sheng-yen Lu was already bold enough to have sex in the consultation room with women?
SHC: Yes. I was one of them.

Cheng: I guess I have asked quite a lot. Some questions, frankly, are sensitive and few would dare to ask, and even fewer would want to reply publicly. These questions surround the details of Lu’s sexual acts with you, such as his sexual positions. Most find you unthinkably brave to disclose such details in your article “My Story”, and even your detractors would think you have some guts even if they continue to call you a bitch. Your article mentioned you had engaged in oral sex and doggy sexual style with Sheng-yen Lu. In his public discourse he claimed to know many sexual positions, as many as sixty-four styles. Can you enlighten us with your account?
SHC: Lu is all bullshit. He only preferred the doggy style. However, there was once he was on top of me, and that was the incident where the jade pillow fell out when he positioned his pillow for me to rest my head. He seemed to have trouble managing his organism and had a pre-matured ejaculation. Thereafter all sexual intercourses were performed doggy style.

Cheng: Average duration per sex?
SHC: I don’t know. As said, I never took notice of the time for each session. All I knew was everytime I entered the consultation room or his room upstairs in the True Buddha Quarter, he would readily have sex with me. He would brush aside my need for consultation, said nothing, and proceeded immediately to bless me with his vajra[penis].

Cheng: What about foreplay?
SHC: We had no foreplay, unless you consider praying to his bodhisattvas and fairies as foreplay.

Cheng: If he did pray to his bodhisattvas and fairies, then the sex would not be ‘immediate’. Are you saying that he would spend time praying to the bodhisattvas before you have sex with him in the upper room, whereas in the consultation room on the ground floor it would be immediate without prayer due to a lack of time?
SHC: He didn’t pray to the bodhisattvas every time. I guess he must have forgotten to do so! There were times he prayed to the bodhisattvas and fairies after he penetrated me, as he would hold me with one hand, while forming a fist with the other hand and placed his fist on his forehead.  When he came to orgasm, he would keep hitting his forehead with his fist.

Cheng: You mentioned about engaging in oral sex with Lu in your article. Is this performed in every sexual intercourse with him?
SHC: We only had oral sex once.

Cheng: Aren’t you worried that the noise created during sex would be heard? After all, walls have ears!
SHC: We maintained silence in the consultation room when we had sex, but Lu would moan when we were having sex upstairs. He said no one was around, so we should not worry at all!

Cheng: You said you and Lu made no noise when you were having sex with him in the consultation room. But the fact that he used the doggy sexual style to penetrate from behind means that the copulation would inevitably produce a rhythmic sound of slapping, which can be loud and easily audible. People can deduce what is happening even if the couple remains silent. How did you possibly control this loudness?
SHC: I don’t really know. I was scared to death. But indeed there was this sound. Lu had previously slapped me on my back as a form of blessing. Perhaps this was his explanation to others, if they dare to ask!

Cheng: Sheng-yen Lu is promoting Twin Body practice in the name of attaining Buddhahood within this lifetime. He openly admits that he is well versed in the art of consort practice, and that this practice is now laundered as an act of cultivation. Even if he admits to having sex with women like yourself, people would not think much of it except that you are cultivating Twin Body with the Master. Yet, the attainment of Twin Body hinges on the fact that one is able to control his ejaculation, and not judged on the sexual act itself. You mentioned that Lu often leaked, and you contracted herpes from him. Those who believe in Lu’s teachings would buy into the benefits of Twin Body practice. Can you elaborate on the frequency and severity of Lu’s seminal ejaculation?
SHC: When Sheng-yen Lu and I were having sex, he told me twice that I would likely get pregnant. And I realized he had many seminal ejaculations during our many sexual sessions. Once I noted he spilled his semen on the floor, yet Lu told me, “it’s yours”. Sheng-yen Lu had leaked too often!

Cheng: What exactly does he mean when he says “its yours”?
SHC: It means Lu was denying the fact that the semen was his ejaculation, but said they were my fluid instead.

Cheng: I see. Maybe there is a question in many people’s mind. The Seattle temple insisted that you are fabricating all this. But what I am interested to know is between the years from 1997 to 1999, can you let us know how many sexual sessions you had with Sheng-yen Lu? Just a figure will do.
SHC: No less than twenty times.

Cheng: Wow. I am speechless.
Can you also comment on his bad temper, or other out of character behavior that does not resemble a True Buddha? Like many, I build my faith in him through the impression given to me from his books. Yet, through your eyes, did you observe anything that you would like to share, as others who observe likewise would likely not talk about him in public.
SHC: This aspect is something beyond my direct knowledge and experience and I rather not comment on speculative ground. He is despicable and mean in my view, and I don’t want to draw him into my mind and probe his inner maliciousness.

*** The fact that Madam Chong refused to answer something which she did not experience first hand revealed to me a character who spoke directly and candidly about things she knew to be true by her own personal experience. I had personally experienced the disdain shown to me by Lu, whom I had believed to be a true Buddha. Yet, the Lu I later came to know was someone who is absolutely bad tempered and arrogant. This revelation by way of his example was more conclusive than the two hundred over books he wrote and painted about himself. In my view, he is far from being a true practitioner, let alone a Buddha.***

Cheng: Like to share something with you. I once spent all my life savings, about USD$7000, bought two air tickets and flew to Tahiti with my wife in search of Grandmaster Lu during his retreat.  We spent a good ten days tracking four islands in French Polynesia [Huahine, Raiatea, Moorea and Tahiti]. We didn’t locate him, but met a Chinese businessman who was curious about our search, and helped us check as he was well connected. He subsequently told us there was only one record of Lu’s visit to Tahiti, dated prior to Lu’s official retreat. That shocked us. We were undeterred, and decided upon return to Singapore that we continued to Hawaii to search for Lu, based on his descriptions, and tracked fruitlessly for nine days. We had foolishly wanted to offer Lu a bag of Ginseng head to make tea, as a way of giving support. Our single-pointedness of heart can move heavens. Yet today I told my wife, good thing we didn’t find Lu, as it is likely that he would want to take advantage of my wife, and since we have no idea what sort of a person he really is, we would literally be screwed!
SHC: Thank goodness! That was close! You mean he didn’t escape to Tahiti for his retreat? He lied again!

Cheng: Lu didn’t want you to locate him, so he played hide and seek. On the surface he was entering retreat, but in reality he was hiding in Taiwan. He was temporary staying in Oahu in Hawaii, and later visited Korea. I forgot to ask. How much money did you owe your lawyers? Did they come after you for payment? Are you able to pay them in full? Do you get financial help from others, like from your children?
SHC: I still owe my lawyers slightly over ten thousand US dollars. I don’t have the means to repay them. My husband is in and out of job over these ten years due to his poor English skills. My lawyers never chase me for payment. They just send me a monthly statement. I have relied upon myself to sustain my livelihood through the years. My children have their family and commitment, and I don’t want my children to bear the burden of the legal fee over this bad ass!

Cheng: It has been hard on you. I don’t have much money, and can’t be of any help. Maybe by publishing your email in this interview would help. If anyone wants to help you financially, they can contact you directly at shcstory4667@gmail.com.
SHC: It’s OK. Thank you for your help. I only wish that those who are fixated at Lu’s falsehood will leave his devil’s claws one day!

Cheng:  Lu publicly said that all consorts must be at least 18 years old, and frankly I am worried about the parents in True Buddha School who have young daughters in this age group. Lu has opened a Pandora box when he openly endorsed this licentious practice, and knowing how degraded his inner circle disciples can be, many would sexually abuse the opposite sex in the name of cultivation. I can foresee how bad this can get. Do you have any advise for these parents in True Buddha School?
SHC: This is why I want to press charges against Sheng-yen Lu, and revealed my story online, exposing myself (no pun intended!) to the world about my story. This is what I want to say to you. Wake up! One spiritual slip brings perpetual grief.
***

With this, I conclude my interview with Madam Chong. Honestly, having read SHC’s reply, I could still feel her rage even after all these years since reading her first posting. I admire her courage to speak up, and as one reader Raymond wrote on this website, (http://sixearsmonkey.wordpress.com), “I believe in Madam Chong solely on the ground that unless a woman really hates you, no woman in her right mind would gamble her chastity, her husband’s name, her children’s future, her family well being; forced to put up with the prejudice of men, and brave all possible threat to her life, only to falsely accuse Sheng-yen Lu of sexual abuse.”
I do not know Madam Chong personally, and I swear I never give her any monetary reward to collaborate with me on this interview. I speak with my conscience as I conduct this interview with Madam Chong, with the sole intention of exposing this self-proclaimed false Buddha called Sheng-yen Lu. Lu is indeed a wolf in sheep’s clothing, a lustful monk who sugar coats his Buddhist teachings to satisfy his sexual craving.
Sheng-yen Lu recently told his disciples not to believe in rumors about him, insinuating that we are fabricating lies to slander him. The fact that he said this further convinced me that my decision to leave him was a correct one. This scumbag is capable of lying through his teeth.
To those hardheaded disciples who remain skeptical and dismiss these accounts as fabrication, I wish you well, as you would certainly need all the luck you can get if the next sexual victim of Sheng-yen Lu happens to be someone you love and know.